Identifying and Combating the Threat and Enhancing the Promise of Social and Behavioral Genomics

Genes are sources of ‘promise and peril’ and ‘fear and fascination.’ Claims regarding genetic differences in human behavior and social outcomes have been a pervasive and oftentimes ugly feature of American society at least since the eugenics movement of the early twentieth century. Today, the rapidly growing field of social/behavioral genomics investigates whether and how genetic differences between individuals relate to differences in behaviors (e.g., aggression) and social outcomes (e.g., educational attainment). Debate about the risks and benefits of this science is staunch and polarizing. Many researchers are optimistic that this work will increase understanding of human behavior, improve health and well-being, and reduce societal inequality. Others worry it will be misused in service of racist, classist, and ableist claims.

This panel includes interdisciplinary scholars examining different facets of the ELSI of social/behavioral genomics. The goal of the panel is to draw on empirical research to understand the potential harms and benefits of this genomic research and to identify ways to mitigate the potential harms and maximize the potential benefits. Each speaker will present for 15 minutes, followed by 30 minutes of moderated Q&A.

Authors: Anya Prince, University of Iowa; Lucas Matthews, Columbia University; Kriste Kuczynski, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill; Daphne Martschenko, Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics